Validation study of Boil & Spin Malachite Green Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification (B&S MG-LAMP) versus microscopy for malaria detection in the Peruvian Amazon.

Malaria elimination efforts in Peru have dramatically reduced the incidence of cases in the Amazon Basin. To achieve the elimination, the detection of asymptomatic and submicroscopic carriers becomes a priority. Therefore, efforts should focus on tests sensitive enough to detect low-density parasitemia, deployable to resource-limited areas and affordable for large screening purposes. In this study, we assessed the performance of the Malachite-Green LAMP (MG-LAMP) using heat-treated DNA extraction (Boil & Spin; B&S MG-LAMP) on 283 whole blood samples collected from 9 different sites in Loreto, Peru and compared its performance to expert and field microscopy. A real-time PCR assay was used to quantify the parasite density. In addition, we explored a modified version of the B&S MG-LAMP for detection of submicroscopic infection in 500 samples and compared the turnaround time and cost of the MG-LAMP with microscopy. Compared to expert microscopy, the genus B&S MG-LAMP had a sensitivity of 99.4% (95%CI: 96.9%- 100%) and specificity of 97.1% (95%CI: 91.9%- 99.4%). The P. vivax specific B&S MG-LAMP had a sensitivity of 99.4% (96.6%- 100%) and specificity of 99.2% (95.5%- 100%) and the P. falciparum assay had a sensitivity of 100% (95%CI: 78.2%- 100%) and specificity of 99.3% (95%CI: 97.3%- 99.8%). The modified genus B&S MG-LAMP assay detected eight submicroscopic malaria cases (1.6%) which the species-specific assays did not identify. The turnaround time of B&S MG-LAMP was faster than expert microscopy with as many as 60 samples being processed per day by field technicians with limited training and utilizing a simple heat-block. The modified B&S MG-LAMP offers a simple and sensitive molecular test of choice for the detection of submicroscopic infections that can be used for mass screening in resources limited facilities in endemic settings nearing elimination and where a deployable test is required.

Comparison of real time and malachite-green based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for the detection of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum.

The current context of malaria elimination requires urgent development and implementation of highly sensitive and specific methods for prompt detection and treatment of malaria parasites. Such methods should overcome current delays in diagnosis, allow the detection of low-density infections and address the difficulties in accessing remote endemic communities. In this study, we assessed the performance of the RealAmp and malachite-green loop mediated isothermal amplification (MG-LAMP) methodologies, using microscopy and conventional nested-PCR as reference techniques. Both LAMP techniques were performed for Plasmodium genus, P. falciparum, and P. vivax identification using 136 whole blood samples collected from three communities located in the Peruvian Amazon basin. Turnaround time and costs of performing the LAMP assays were estimated and compared to that of microscopy and nested-PCR. Using nested-PCR as reference standard, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity and 95% confidence interval (CI) for all methods. RealAmp had a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 85-96.5%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 89.1-100%) for species detection; sensitivity and specificity of MG-LAMP were 94% (95% CI: 87.5-97.8%) and 100% (89.1-100%), respectively. Whereas microscopy showed 88.1% sensitivity (95% CI: 80.2-93.7%) and 100% specificity (95%: 89.1-100%). The turnaround time and costs of performing the LAMP assays were lower compared to those associated with nested-PCR but higher than those associated with microscopy. The two LAMP assays were shown to be more sensitive and simple to implement than microscopy. Both LAMP methodologies could be used as large-scale screening tests, but the MG-LAMP assay uses a simple, portable heat-block while the RealAmp requires a RealAmp machine or a real-time PCR machine. This makes the MG-LAMP an appropriate choice for malaria surveillance studies in endemic sites. Use of LAMP tests in active case detection of Plasmodium parasites could help to detect positive malaria cases early.